Neil Lent wrote:
>
> Hello everybody
>
> I'm suprised that a debate with such a clear and simple answer continues.
>
> Regarding sabbaticals exemption or otherwise the answer is very simple.
>
> If they have completed the course by the Department of Environment
> definition of a full time student they are not a full time student. If
> they have not completed their course and have taken time out from study
> then they are a full time student by this definition.
>
> It seem to me that any institution (such as Nottingham) that does not
> recognise this definition is effectively putting itself above the law.
>
> I hope this makes things clearer.
>
> Neil
I made a statement to the above effect, though not so succinctly, at the
start of this debate, several months ago. Neil is correct in all
respects.
Tony
--
AJ Flack
Assistant Registrar
UEA
Norwich NR4 7TJ
01603 592967
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|