JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ENVIROETHICS Archives


ENVIROETHICS Archives

ENVIROETHICS Archives


enviroethics@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS  1998

ENVIROETHICS 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: [Re: Consumption & Sustainability]

From:

Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 2 Nov 1998 13:22:17 -0800 (PST)

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (131 lines)

Uhhhmmm, actually you would want to total all costs involved as well
as all the costs that are avoided in looking at this issue. To argue
that since families incur large finacial burdens thus so does society
is fallacious reasoning. As is the appeal to pity at the end of your
post.

Steve




---Alan Nichols <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Speaking as someone who has had a parent die of cancer, I would like
to point
> out that very rarely do cancer patients simply drop dead. More
often, there
> is a period of intense suffering from which death is a welcome
release.
> As this is the case, smoking actually causes quite a financial
burden on
> society, either through higher insurance rates or increased Medicaid
costs.
> But I am sure you were/are aware of this and were/are merely trying
to be
> funny. And as we all know, there's nothing funnier than people
dying of
> cancer. If you weren't trying to be funny, then it strikes me that
you well
> may be suffering from some cerebral shortcoming. Either way, your
comments
> were incredibly insensitive and offensive.
>
>
> Alan Nichols
>
>
>
>
> [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm temporarily on NOMAIL so won't see comments on this posting but,
> before I deleted this older message from Steve, I have a comment for
> consideration.
>
> We have several problems here in the USA of, (like most of the
world),
> overpopulation and, in addition, we have shortfalls in our funding for
> medical care and social security payments to our older folks.
>
> I submit that, either as a built-in human instinctive adaptation to
global
> problems or just plain stupidity, tobacco smoking is helping solve
all of
> the above problems. Just think, while these smokers may have extra
outages
> during their working career due to early indications of future early
death
> from cancer or other tobacco related diseases, they mostly live into
their
> late-40s to late-50s and work to improve the economony and pay into
the
> Medicare and Social Security funds and then, years before their
normal life
> expectancy, THEY DROP DEAD and leave all those funds available for
the rest
> of the old folks.
>
> No one ever computes how many years would be added to the life
expectancy
> in the USA if everyone suddenly quit smoking or how quickly the
acturarial
> calculations of funding versus life expectancy would really fall
apart.
> Myself, I'm waiting for our tobacco industry to lose one of state
law suits
> on the early deaths from smoking and then turn around and sue the
federal
> Government for recovery of those funds on the grounds of saving the
> retirement programs by reducing overall life expectancy.
>
> Fred Schaff
>
>
>
> >
> >Ahh, we have definition problem here. I do not equate an
individual's
> >overall welfare with their phyisical health. Eating chocolate is for
> >all intents and purposes an unhealthy activity, but to totally remove
> >it from my life would make me worse off. A similar argument could be
> >made for cigarettes. I have a friend that likes to experiment with
> >drugs. He has found that nothing gives him a rush like smoking a
> >cigarette on the way to work. He knows it is unhealthy, but he likes
> >to do it and he says it makes him feel better (well at least for
> >now...40 years from now who knows). By your arguments here are some
> >items people should not be allowed to buy
> >
> >1. Fatty foods--they may taste good, but they may eventually kill
you.
> >2. Alcohol--may taste good and being buzzed may be fun but it may
> >eventually kill you or another.
> >3. Cigarettes--may be fun and cool, but may eventually kill you.
> >4. Knives--after you cut yourself, you realize you would have been
> >better off not having the knife and not chopping those carrots.
> >5. Cars--Could kill you or another, and contributes to pollution.
> >
> >In fact, all of the above goods probably have large negative
> >externalities associated with them (except maybe for the knife). Is
> >this also sufficient to prohibit their production.
> >
> >
> >Steve
> >_________________________________________________________
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> More than just email--Get your FREE Netscape WebMail account today
at http://home.netscape.com/netcenter/mail
>

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
May 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
October 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
July 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager