JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ENVIROETHICS Archives


ENVIROETHICS Archives

ENVIROETHICS Archives


enviroethics@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS  1998

ENVIROETHICS 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Is Altruism consistent with environmentalsim?

From:

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 07 Dec 1998 11:00:26 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (86 lines)

At 02:18 PM 12/6/1998 EST, Suzanne wrote:
>If the end result of altruism is some benefit then why not extend it to all
>components of the earth and the earth as a whole? Is this a case of the end
>justifying the means? Or is justification even a consideration? Does being
>human have to be a limiting factor?

I quess we approach the world as a 'constituted world' in which social
interactions and private actions are experienced as real and meaningful. In
our believing, communicating, loving, learning, fighting, dreaming,
perceiving and judging we enter the stream of events in our world with
intentions. Our being in the world has intention. Intentionality "implies
embodiment in a world pre-reflectively given at any moment in and through
'my situation.' *Any such situation orginates intersubjectively: We ARE born
of mothers.* Consciousness, intersubjectivity, and situation necessarily
intertwine, then....the concept that points to their interconnection is
"social action." [Mary Rogers, The idea of phenomenlogical sociology, IN
Sociology, Ethnomethdology and Experience. 1983. Cambridge Univ. Press]

"The objective of subjectively meaningful action through ideal types [I pose
the ideal type here as an altruist to natures entities on earth] requires
adherence to three postulates. The postulate of logical consistency requires
a system of constructs be compatible with the requirements of formal logic;
the postulate of subjective interpretation - what typical knowledge must be
attributed to intentional acts; postulate of adequacy - scientific models of
human action be constructed so that if an actor in the life-world conformed
to its specifications or what he or she did would be understandable to that
individual and other common sense individuals."

So my answer relies on the de-construction of some past actions that in my
mind are already actable again in some way that would be understood by
common sense individuals, and ultimately would pass the test of the
ends-means continuum/progression. Altruism toward the earth as a social
action is or may be hypothesized in one of two ways: 1) we are born of
mothers whose lives were nourished by other mothers and by the elements of
the earth. We and my mothers were complete before "THIS HAPPENED, and
intersubjectively we all KNOW THAT IT IS HAPPENING AGAIN AND AGAIN in many
places. Maybe I will go to Tanzania or Chile and correct the cause -
reflectively. Altruism to the earth is deserved because the earth is
altruistic to me, and my dreams, and to my constellation of friends; or 2)
altruism on the part of the earth is a given. It is only necessary to
acknowledge this daily as an supreme organizing principle of which life and
happiness is not possible without this realization - i.e. a mother of core
beliefs. Hi Mom.

We do a lot of judging. It is part of our embodiment in the world. In
judging our actions and others - even their judgements - we are enacting a
previous actor seen or believed that may be a grandmother or some other
common sense individual. In a sense inter pares, between equals.

"In the world of daily life, actors are only partially rational."

This is important. For the world to be scrutinized, the less standard the
daily routine, the greater the scrutinizing. Hence if the world - the
natural world - imbalances the carrying capacity/ ecological footprints
among individuals.nations - seem to be more irrational in appearance, then
the more likely the greater the scrutiny. This is known as the "paradox of
rationality". The more absurd the events in the world, external and
internal, the more intense the need for common sense and scientific
scrutiny, as this becomes a mode of being concerned about an impetus for
social action. Extending altruism to all life is a form of living out a
hypothesis regarding social action that is understood in two ways:
intersubjectively in the moment through intentionality, and possibly
reflectively as a field of research. Writing or story telling is a field of
research - when it is about ones life or ones mother.


John


"Everyone has adventures."

Roquentin_ La Nausee. Sartre








        



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
May 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
October 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
July 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager