JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ENVIROETHICS Archives


ENVIROETHICS Archives

ENVIROETHICS Archives


enviroethics@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS  1998

ENVIROETHICS 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Is Altruism consistent with environmentalsim?

From:

Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask][log in to unmask]> wrote:
Steven,

My comments are below.

> Steve responds;
> >
> >So some firms should be allowed to pollute?
> >
> Bissell answers;
> No! wasn't that my point? Individual firms *should not* be allowed to
> pollute even if the total pollution in whatever area is being
measured is
> acceptable.

Sorry I was being a tad sarcastic, I thought it was obvious, sorry for
the confusion. Are you now advocating a "no pollution goal"? I think
that such a goal would have an extremely high cost, perhaps a cost so
high as to [...]47_6Nov199815:32:43-0800(PST)[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 4 Dec 1998 08:41:28 -0800 (PST)

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (172 lines)

Bryan,

If you want to say that the planet is an individual as in a single
unit thats fine with me since there is obviously not two Earths.
However, your post was about treating the planet as an individual in
the context of altruism. Thus, I made the assumption that you were
assigning some sort of human characteristics to the planet. Otherwise
we could just as easily be talking about a big rock out in the middle
of the desert. Now I suppose we could treat the rock altruistically
(how exactly this would be done is not clear to me), but as Steven
Bissel asked, why?

Also, my main criticism still stands with some simple rewording.

Humans are covered with countless micro-organisms.
The Earth is covered with countless micro-organisms, therefore the
planet has some form of human characteristics.

It is still a false analogy.

Steve



---Bryan Hyden <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> steve,
>
> if you are going to criticize something that i wrote, the least you
could do
> would be to not totally change what i said into something
different....
>
> >Humans are comprised of billions of individual cells.
> >The planet is comprised of billions of humans, therefore the planet
is
> >a human.
> >
> >Not quite.
>
> this is beyond a horrible summary of what i wrote... bissell said
that the
> planet is convered with individual organisms and that therefore it
could not
> itself be an individual... i was alluding to the fact that humans
are
> covered with countless micro-organisms (and micro is a relative
> measurement), something which does not stop us from being
individuals....
> i never said that earth was a human..... as you say, that would be
> preposerous... as is your version of what i wrote....
>
> bryan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thursday, December 03, 1998 2:27 AM
> Subject: Re: Is Altruism consistent with environmentalsim?
>
>
> >Bryan,
> >
> >I do believe this is a good example of a false analogy.
> >
> >Humans are comprised of billions of individual cells.
> >The planet is comprised of billions of humans, therefore the planet
is
> >a human.
> >
> >Not quite.
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >---Bryan Hyden wrote:
> >>
> >> >Not that open,
> >> >Because it's kinda dumb to suggest that a planet covered with
> >googols of
> >> >individual organisms is an individual.
> >>
> >> sorry steven, but you did it again... :)
> >>
> >> why, just look at us humans.... we are, as you say, "covered with
> >googols
> >> of individual organisms" and are still considered individuals,
> >> individually....
> >>
> >> bryan
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Steven Bissell <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Date: Wednesday, December 02, 1998 11:24 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Is Altruism consistent with environmentalsim?
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: Bryan Hyden <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >Date: Wednesday, December 02, 1998 8:22 PM
> >> >Subject: Re: Is Altruism consistent with environmentalsim?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>>Why would you do that?
> >> >>
> >> >>steven, you leave yourself wide open! :)
> >> >>
> >> >>why not?
> >> >>
> >> >>bryan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Not that open,
> >> >Because it's kinda dumb to suggest that a planet covered with
> >googols of
> >> >individual organisms is an individual.
> >> >
> >> >Steven
> >> >
> >> >>>>>Almost by definition, "no." There is no way I can think of to
> >extend
> >> >>>>>altruism to the planet, that's an individual to individual
> >action as
> >> >near
> >> >>>>as
> >> >>>>>I can see
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>perhaps i was not clear... i was suggesting that the planet
may
> >be
> >> >viewed
> >> >>>>as 'an individual'....
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>bryan
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Why would you do that?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Bissell
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_________________________________________________________
> >DO YOU YAHOO!?
> >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
May 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
October 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
July 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager