JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ENVIROETHICS Archives


ENVIROETHICS Archives

ENVIROETHICS Archives


enviroethics@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS  1998

ENVIROETHICS 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Perceptions of sustainability

From:

Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 6 Nov 1998 10:30:29 -0800 (PST)

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (54 lines)

---D East <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Steve wrote:
> > Actually, I think your reasoning is incorrect for the following
> > reason. I don't think individuals really care what plant is doing
the
> > polluting. That is I don't think individuals care that they air is
> > dirty because firm A or B is polluting, but that individuals care
that
> > the air is dirty and they want it reduced (I am assuming that the
two
> > firms produce the same pollution). The reason for this is that when
> > they go outside they don't see which particles of pollution are
> > produced by firm A and those that are produced by firm B. When they
> > take a breath and cough they don't say "Goddamn that firm B. I wish
> > someone would do something about firm B."
> >
>
> Surely this is false? If I remember my Risk management course (it
was a
> while ago) the NIMBY (not in my back yard) scenario was prevalent.
People
> may not object to trading credits in principle but if its the local
factory
> doing to polluting then its different story.
> You seem to be hypothesising a ideal situation with two factories in
the
> local town trading credits when in actual fact it is more likely
the trade
> will take place across a considerable distance and will therefore any
> benefit will vary enormously with location.
>

Duncan,

You do have a point in that the spatial component would cause an
uneven distribution of pollution. However, even in a town with one
factory would still reduce its pollution. What has gotten lost in the
latest flurry of posts is that all firms would be reducing pollution.
Some would re-tool and others would buy permits. The key to having
the permit or credit trading scheme work is for the permits to be
somehow tied to production. That way the marginal cost curve of the
firm would shift up at all levels of production. If we assume that
price is a constant (from the firm's perspective--i.e. the market is
competitive) then output falls and so does pollution.

Steve
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
May 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
October 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
July 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager