[log in to unmask] wrote:
> Ken Edwards, for understandable reasons, thinks he's raising the same
> point by
> describing Reality Street's need for funds. Instead, he has an
> equally valid
> different point.
>
> None of this means anything, you see, unless someone new gets up and
> running.
Why, though? Am I the only person who doesn't follow this? Ken Edwards
and Wendy Mulford have already shown how, by joining forces, they can do
more, therefore begin to tilt the world a little, which is what people
were I think talking about, in the
British-Council-establishment-monolith thread (relevance of Ken's
reversion to previous subject line, in fact). What if Christopher Emery
went to them with his proposition?
elizabeth
--
Elizabeth James
National Art Library, Victoria & Albert Museum, London SW7 2RL
+44 (0)171 938 8460; fax +44 (0)171 938 8461
"to catalogue is not merely to ascertain ... but also to appropriate"
(R. Barthes)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|