Weibel,Stu wrote:
> I lean towards including the short blurb about CVs being good things and
> that a future document will discuss them. I think John is right that
> such a redirection should be explicit... Is there a way we can point to
> the Qualified Semantics RFC? [insert response from Paul Miller and Tony
> Gill here]
Absolutely -- I've been working on the syntax one, and have included the
list summarising the whole RFC series from John Kunze's revised
DC-Simple draft, plus a number of placeholders for cross-references to
other RFCs in the series. I think it would be helpful if all of the
RFC's contained the same summary list, so any changes to the series or
the titles (such as has been discussed recently) need to be agreed now
if possible.
T.
-- Tony Gill ---------------------- Programme Leader: ADAM & VADS --
Surrey Institute of Art & Design * Farnham * Surrey * GU9 7DS * UK
Tel: +44 (0)1252 722441 x2427 * Fax: +44 (0)1252 712925
-- [log in to unmask] -- http://adam.ac.uk -- http://vads.ahds.ac.uk/ --
|