-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
"Weibel,Stu" writes:
| I confess I am not a subscriber to this list. I further confess I hope
| not to be. It may be that we have to separate general discussions from
| implementation discussions. Is there general consensus that this is the
| time for this to happen? Of those of you who are subscribed to both, is
| it your sense that this must be the case?
Perhaps it would be worth having a roll-call of implementations?
Cheerio,
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNDDGGNZdpXZXTSjhAQFungP/Qlr3cgswGZeGpKLeP++ScfByGUerV+f9
DH6kpIW9TL9GwdwJ1ydgzxYn0SyfPUv2M0Khm2UKTH0xX7ALz0gyBn9VFfd/VYUD
5hGffuSQ4GgbRIyWLc7megf2SGCwJ9qdfm+pWStvJuP86EX1MTBSdLCLjSznfxxN
b+9LMlyeKuk=
=xr+G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|