Ray Denenberg wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Actually, I suggest that coverage be changed to "geographic coverage" and
> that temporal coverage be covered by date. I have not seen any suggestions
> for coverage qualifiers besides temporal and geographic. If I'm mistaken
> on this point then I withdraw this suggestion.
>
> So my suggestion is:
> - change coverage to "geographic coverage". So this element would no
> longer need to be qualified.
> - put "temporal coverage" in the "date" bucket.
[snip]
>
The current version of Mary's Coverage paper (linked from the DC Web site)
contains all of the following. So I'm puzzled about the suggestion for an
unqualified DC.coverage element. What would it mean?
coverage.periodName
coverage.placeName
coverage.x.min
coverage.x.max
coverage.y.min
coverage.y.max
coverage.z
coverage.t.min
coverage.t.max
coverage.polygon.include
coverage.polygon.exclude
coverage.line
Mary - Is the absence of coverage.z.min and coverage.z.max intentional?
Misha
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
Reuters Ltd.
|