I'm hoping that that roll call is reflected substantially in the
prokject summaries I asked for a week or three ago.
They are being listed on both the DC 5 page and on the DC-homepage link
(Projects).
If your project is not there, send me a note!
stu
On Tuesday, September 30, 1997 5:28 AM, Martin Hamilton
[SMTP:[log in to unmask]] wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
> "Weibel,Stu" writes:
>
> | I confess I am not a subscriber to this list. I further confess I
hope
> | not to be. It may be that we have to separate general discussions
from
> | implementation discussions. Is there general consensus that this is
the
> | time for this to happen? Of those of you who are subscribed to
both, is
> | it your sense that this must be the case?
>
> Perhaps it would be worth having a roll-call of implementations?
>
> Cheerio,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3i
> Charset: noconv
>
> iQCVAwUBNDDGGNZdpXZXTSjhAQFungP/Qlr3cgswGZeGpKLeP++ScfByGUerV+f9
> DH6kpIW9TL9GwdwJ1ydgzxYn0SyfPUv2M0Khm2UKTH0xX7ALz0gyBn9VFfd/VYUD
> 5hGffuSQ4GgbRIyWLc7megf2SGCwJ9qdfm+pWStvJuP86EX1MTBSdLCLjSznfxxN
> b+9LMlyeKuk=
> =xr+G
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
|