Gary,
I think many META2 folk are in fact interested in these issues, and I
personally would like to see the discussion remain focussed on one list,
lest we fragment and grow less coherent than we already are. There may
well come a time that we have to split into groups, and I'm willing to
go down that path... just hoping that we don't need to yet.
Traffic on this list occasionally gets unmanageable (stu recalls with a
shudder november-last...) but it seems to settle back into acceptable
proportions after a bit.
stu
On Tuesday, September 30, 1997 5:48 AM, Gary Malet
[SMTP:[log in to unmask]] wrote:
> The discussion on meta2 seems to address subtyping of the elements,
i.e,
> cataloguing, and preparation and followup to meetings.
>
> The html-metadata list has not been used since June.
>
> I believe many implementors need to discuss rudimentary syntax issues,
> search engine design, appropriate tools, the cost benefit of
implementing
> DC, the granularity of resource description, compatibility of DC with
> versions of HTML., etc. I have the impression that the current
> contributors are not as interested in those discussions?
>
> Gary Malet
>
|