Booklet is vague and article is not matched by journal or magazine.
InCollection is not matched by Collection (which is what, a scrapbook
or a set of books?).
I'm in favor of a short delimited list, too, but this doesn't look
like the one.
Regards,
Terry Allen Electronic Publishing Consultant tallen[at]sonic.net
http://www.sonic.net/~tallen/
Davenport and DocBook: http://www.ora.com/davenport/index.html
>From [log in to unmask] Thu Jul 17 05:12:19 1997
Received: from gizmo.lut.ac.uk ([log in to unmask] [158.125.96.46]) by sub.sonic.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA07920 for <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 05:12:15 -0700
X-envelope-info: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from majordom by gizmo.lut.ac.uk with local (Exim 1.61 #1)
id 0wooze-0003tu-00; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 12:45:10 +0100
Received: from oclc.org [132.174.19.11]
by gizmo.lut.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 1.61 #1)
id 0woozZ-0003tQ-00; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 12:45:06 +0100
Received: from orc.NISOR (orc.dev.oclc.org) by oclc.org (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA29231; Thu, 17 Jul 97 07:43:59 EDT
Received: by orc.NISOR (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id HAA09496; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 07:43:59 -0400
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 07:43:59 -0400
From: [log in to unmask] (Stu Weibel)
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Resource Types
Cc: [log in to unmask]
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Simon's suggestion that we adopt Bib-Tex categories for print-media
categories is a winner in my estimation. So much so, I am moved to
transcribe them below.
Any documentalists out there know any strong objections or exceptions?
>From page 145 of the LaTeX User Guide & Reference Manual
Leslie Lamport, 1986
article
book
booklet
inBook
inCollection
inProceedings
manual
mastersThesis
misc
phdThesis
proceedings
techReport
unpublished
|