At 6:56 PM -0000 7/14/97, Stu Weibel wrote:
>Roy writes,
>> If this suggestion meets general approval, I will go out on a limb and
>> volunteer other individuals to serve: me, Arthur Chapman, Gail Clement,
>> and whomever else wants to participate.
>I would very much like to see this happen. Common sense and experience
>tell us that we only make progress on these issues when a small number
>of committed practitioners assume 'ownership' of a manageable part of
>the problem and come forth with concise, thoughtful proposals.
On the other hand, there's nothing like the procreative anarchy of public
opinion! I think one of the things that makes this list productive and
exciting/interesting is the idea that your ideas may eventually become
integrated into something (maybe... [probably not :-7]).
I had the feeling that this list was to remain a "bouncing off" area, so to
speak, where ideas could continue to be shared and critiqued even though
the smaller group would submit the final proposal. If I got this wrong,
let me know.
--------------------------------------------------------
[ Jordan Reiter ]
[ mailto:[log in to unmask] ]
[ "You can't just say, 'I don't want to get involved.' ]
[ The universe got you involved." --Hal Lipset, P.I. ]
--------------------------------------------------------
|