On Thu, 17 Jul 1997, Simon Cox wrote:
> ... and a small number of broad categories have already been
> established and tested and *used widely* for *print-media*
> resources by BibTex, for example. Adopting equivalents to
> those would allow backward compatibility, conversions etc.
> Can we borrow other sets from similar sources?
Well just for the record, BibTeX is exactly where I "borrowed" the core of
resource types for my now deprecated resource types draft (still available
for reference from
<URL:http://www.roads.lut.ac.uk/Metadata/DC-ObjectTypes.html> but with a
"don't use this" note on the front).
Tatty bye,
Jim'll
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jon "Jim'll" Knight, Researcher, Sysop and General Dogsbody, Dept. Computer
Studies, Loughborough University of Technology, Leics., ENGLAND. LE11 3TU.
* I've found I now dream in Perl. More worryingly, I enjoy those dreams. *
|