> Hear hear! I firmly agree with Stu and Rebecca. For a general-purpose
> descriptive standard, the point of diminishing returns is reached VERY
> quickly. Let's just capture the broadest categories and leave it to
> interested communities to worry about finer distinctions. Those broad
> categories will be confusing enough when trying to explain them to
> an audience.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ron Daniel Jr. voice:+1 505 665 0597
Perhaps it would even be a good idea to come up with a
limit to the number of attribute values we want for TYPE?
That would put some pressure on the working group :)
Of course the exact number will be decided later but wouldn't
you think that 20 is more reasonable than 50, if we ever
want this to be used in practice?
/Kenneth
--
_______________________________________
| Kenneth Holmlund |
| Theoretical Physics, Umeå University |
| S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden |
| phone: +46-(0)90-167717 |
| fax: +46-(0)90-169556 |
| mailto:[log in to unmask] |
| http://www.tp.umu.se/~holmlund/ |
---------------------------------------
|