I'm afraid I really don't have anything to add.
The facts as you present them are accurate, and I understand your
concerns.
I'm confident that things are coming together. In fact,
I'm quite excited to see some of these issues finally approaching
closure after the web community has struggled so long to
address them.
I hope things will become more clear to you and everybody
else as things develop.
Brian Kelly wrote:
>
> > Short version: The reluctance to adopt a SCHEME attribute on the META
> > element for the Cougar draft of HTML[1] was based largely on a concern
> > of potential conflicts with other metadata efforts within W3C.
> > After some investigation, I find that this concern is unfounded, and
> > I will try to make this clear to the involved folks so that the SCHEME
> > proposal can go ahead.
>
> Dan
> Thanks for this message.
> I must confess to a certain confusion over how W3C sees the metadata
> architecture developing after the W3C sessions at Rutherford Labs in
> January and WWW6 in April.
> Comments?
--
Dan Connolly, Architecture Domain Lead
http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
phone://1/512/310-2971
|