Rebecca writes:
> I personally don't feel like there's been enough discussion about
> qualifiers to officially bless these. I think there are too many
> qualifiers in the qualifiers documents, potentially resulting in very
> complex records.
I agree with Rebecca. I'm in favor of experimenting with things,
and I can imagine that in the future we might well have rather
complex version of DC records, but to make this path the main road
is, in my view, a mistake, and a distraction from one of the main
design goals: a SIMPLE resource description record.
Let's move cautiously here, and let the needs of the applications
drive the direction. To me, that means simple first and formost,
with an eye towards flexibility to allow elaboration as necessary
stu
|