Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 13:17:49 -0600 (CST)
CC: [log in to unmask]
From: "David B. Serafini" <[log in to unmask]>
X-List: [log in to unmask]
X-Unsub: To leave, send text 'leave comp-fortran-90' to [log in to unmask]
Reply-To: "David B. Serafini" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 1997 11:30:41 -0600
> From: Dick Hendrickson <[log in to unmask]>
> At 04:18 PM 12/5/97 +0000, David B. Serafini wrote:
> >BTW, why didn't F90 allow the general use of labels of the form "<name>:"?
> >I can't see any reason for sticking with numeric labels only.
> >
> >-David
> >
> That's an easy one <grin>. In fixed source form asequence like
> implicit integer (t)
> ...
> assign to to to to
> to continue
> toto continue
> is ambiguous.
Nope. I said using the form "<name>:" The colon should disambiguate.
assign to: to to to
No, this doesn't work either, as it's a labeled statment (albeit a broken one)!
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|