At 04:18 PM 12/5/97 +0000, David B. Serafini wrote:
>
>BTW, why didn't F90 allow the general use of labels of the form "<name>:"?
>I can't see any reason for sticking with numeric labels only.
>
>-David
>
That's an easy one <grin>. In fixed source form asequence like
implicit integer (t)
...
assign to to to to
to continue
toto continue
is ambiguous.
This backwards compatability stuff is sometimes a pain.
Dick
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|