> Is there a flag that can allow one to override the 31 character
> limitation on the names of subroutines and functions? Any plans on
> extending the length in future standards?
What a very bad idea! This works against portability.
I've used a similar flag -nl# which allows the number of continued lines
to be greater than the standard (which is also 31 I believe), and it seems
to be quite portable, i.e. it works on NAG,IBM,Sun(?),SGI, this is portable
enough for me.
How about increasing the limitation in future standards? 31 characters
is too restrictive unless one likes to write subroutine names like
SUBROUTINE iwbcns()
instead of:
SUBROUTINE isothermal_wall_boundary_condition_navier_stokes
_______________________________________________________________________
| Pete Bismuti |
| Supercomputer Computations Research Institute |
| Florida State University - Department of Mathematics |
| [log in to unmask] (904)644-6263 |
|_____________________________________________________________________|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|