Thanks to Robert for those vignettes from the SubVoicive Colloquium. I was
going to do something similar, but too tired. I think the consensus was: a
very good day, much better than the one seven years ago, more useful.
Thanks Lawrence and everybody.
Regarding Robert's comment about my reminding everyone about the poetry
(sorry, I accidentally deleted the message, so can't refer to it) - what I
mean is, poetics is dead in the water without poetry. But it's easier to
theorise than to read poetry. Theory without poetry is the soft option.
By the way, my neighbour's cat has just informed me he hates language
poetry. He hasn't got round to actually reading any yet, but that Barrett
Watten has never offered him so much as a bowl of milk.
Ken
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|