Robert wrote
>Can there be innovation without progress? Does art get better? Or is this
an attitude or a stance for the artist?
'Art' is most simply a codification of perception/'imagination' -- a ' way
' of seeing and a system of communication that lets "us" discuss "it" with
"others"; it cannot in itself "get better", only ways of seeing & means of
discussion get better, which makes it entirely dependent on the attitude or
stance of the artist. "Progress" doesn't equate with "better". Innovation
in art should be taking place entirely independently of "progress" and
"better".
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|