cris cheek wrote:
> Interesting this, to me at least, is the implication that
> the work is either about oneself or about others' selves.
>
> One of the things i enjoy about early Lang-po is the
> emphasis on 'the work'.
I agree, I think that's the term exactly: emphasis. But emphases are made
within a locus of relevance, rather than constituting one themselves; L
surely wouldn't want to be L as opposed to people's L? That seems to me
inescapable, at least within an avowedly political practice. Besides
which, there are so many -names-, so many university chairs held etc.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|