So, Keston, criticism by "language" writers is "mere ballocks". Oh all
right, that disposes of that, then. No need to read any of it, especially
as you've managed to come to that judgement without, on your own admission,
reading too much of it yourself.
DS Marriott took eleven pages of "fragmente" 6 to come to similar
conclusions about the "language" project as a whole, without, apparently,
troubling himself to read _any_ of the poetry (well, he didn't quote or
refer to any).
And while we're at it, what's "so refreshing" about someone dismissing the
whole of Eric Mottram's oeuvre in a sentence?
K
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|