Jon Knight wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Daniel LaLiberte wrote:
> > Here is a different perspective: from high enough above this
> > element-name-hell, the names of elements are irrelevant. We (someone)
> > will need to provide mappings between different schemas anyway, and as
> > long as the schemas are well defined enough to support the mappings,
> > it doesnt matter what things are called.
>
> Good point; I think we should all just take the last set of DC element
> names that Stu posted and just run with them (and _not_ change them
> again for _at_least_ a year! :-)).
>
And maybe then evaluate use/abuse.
--
Frank A. Roos ([log in to unmask] http://www.cwi.nl/~faroos/)
CWI - Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica / Bibliotheek
- Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science / Library
http://www.cwi.nl/cwi/departments/BIBL.html
|