> > <META NAME="DC.author" CONTENT="(SCHEME=email)[log in to unmask]">
For what it's worth...
this might go down better in the HTML world (I'm not sure) like this:
<META NAME="DC.author" CONTENT="email:[log in to unmask]">
Well, for this example, one would use
<META NAME="DC.author" CONTENT="mailto:[log in to unmask]">
because that's already been defined for URLs, and there seems no reason to
be different/incompatible.
Making the syntax look like a URL might make people more comfortable with it.
I know it probbaly seems silly, but comfortable people are happy people.
Or, to quote Terry Gilliam, Suspicion Breeds COnfidence :-)
Lee
--
Liam Quin, SoftQuad Inc | lq-text freely available Unix text retrieval
[log in to unmask] +1 416 239 4801 | FAQs: Metafont fonts, OPEN LOOK UI, OpenWindows
SGML: http://www.sq.com/ |`Consider yourself... one of the family...
The barefoot programmer | consider yourself... At Home!' [the Artful Dodger]
|