On 2 Jul 96 at 20:51, Paul.Treanor wrote:
> The two listed organisers are from the ca domain.
implying they should use a French abstract as well? to satisfy
Quebec?
Forth Wort,
> although I do not know the exact figures, will have a substantial
> Spanish-speaking population. yet message and proposed session are
> definitively Anglo-linguistic.
perhaps this is an issue US members could take up with the AAG, if it
is not already in hand.
>
> If post-structuralist thought is an exclusively
> English-language thought,
> >
presumably such well known *anglophones* as
Jacques Derrida
Paul Virillio
Barthes
Gilles Deleuze
Michel Foucault
Paul de Man
Martin Heidegger
Helene Cixous
Luce Irigaray
don't count. I thought the standard Anglophone criticism of
post-structuralism was that it was French based movement inimitable
to the Anglo-American analytic philosophical tradition?
In terms of the geography of it, there does seem something still to
be said even after Said's and Clifford's comments on *travelling
theory* have been run into the ground. It might be an idea to think
it through as Trevor Barnes does the quantitative moment in his new
book. One day when I have time...
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|