[log in to unmask] (Stu Weibel) wrote:
>
> The 'dot' convention was judged a simple alternative to the grouping
> mechanism that Eric Miller proposed in a one page proposal that I
> presented to the group at the workshop. Some in the group that run
> robots felt that it was too complex (they would have to rewrite code).
But, they will have to write new code anyway....one extra
strcmp ??? ;-)
> I am inclined to agree that it is not the most elegant implementation,
> but I do think it is workable and everyone can live with it. That is a
> big win in my estimation.
So, is it 'official' ?
What is the next stage?
Cheers... Renato
_______________________________________________________________________
Dr Renato Iannella http://www.dstc.edu.au/RDU/staff/ri
Research Data Network CRC urn:inet:dstc.edu.au:renato:home
DSTC Pty Ltd, Gehrmann Laboratories phone/fax: +61 7 3365 4310/11
University of Queensland, 4072, AUSTRALIA email: [log in to unmask]
|