Why does the DoH keep giving licences to new "me-to" drugs with little or no
benefits?
I refer to yet another NSAID which a rep paraded before this week and a new
topical herpes cream, the research upon which is held on file by the
company, has not been published and so, in my view, cannot be trusted.
Heretic statement - the Doh/CSM should not be licencing new drugs (without
clear benefits over current treatments), but should be removing the licences
of some of the crap that has got through.
--------------------------
Dr David J Plews
email: [log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|