In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
> In message <[log in to unmask]>, Peter Glover
> <[log in to unmask]> writes
> >In message <[log in to unmask]>,
> >[log in to unmask] writes
> >>In a message dated 04/08/96 22:26:28, Hotch writes:
> >>
> >>>Ah, now I never said gp wasn't interesting, but I think
> >>>I would be willing to debate the motion: "For the most part,
> >>>general practice in 1996 is no fun!"
> >>
> >>I would be willing to oppose the motion. Any takers for seconding?
> >>
> >>I
> >>
> >>All those in favour of a formal debate say aye
> >>
> >>Trefor Roscoe
> There seem to be a lot of "ayes" .. er .. could someone start the
> debate? :-)
> Mary Hawking
But how's the voting to be done? Could non GPs get to be involved by for
example acting as Speaker and vote counters? And do these same non GPs
get to throw the email equivalent of rotten fruit? Could we be allowed
to vote on aspects such as wit and incisiveness?
Alan Hyslop
Computing & IT Strategy
Management Executive, NHS in Scotland.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|