At 07:22 10/08/1996 +0100, you wrote:
>Andrew Herd wrote:
>>
>> In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Jon Wilcox wrote:
>>
>> > Lurking journo's are one thing, but lurking lawyers are a different ball
>> > game.
>> > This really, really, really bothers me. This Company (Alert UK)
>> > specialises in suing doctors, the pharmaceutical industry and other
>> > professionals.
>>
>> I've got to say that if there are lawyers in this list, I am leaving. I
>> simply cannot see the point of including them.
>>
>> Trims? Anyone care to confirm?
------------------------------------------------
I agree totally with Andrew's sentiments. My (probably like Andrew's)
experience of members of the legal profession is entirely negative. But I'm
glad to say that I've "not lost a case" yet. In any form of medico-legal
proceedings only the "parasites" win.
But/unfortunately, this group is public. I don't think anyone can be
excluded except for a misdemenour. Anyway, they could always immediately
rejoin under a new alias.
The question uppermost now is, who else is out there?
------------------------------------------------
>
>
>Can I respond to all those commenting on my lurking around.
>Many cases do involve doctors and Health Authorities as Defendants, but
>that itself is not my speciality per se.
>
>etc
>Graham Ross
>
How many cases involve the suing of "legal advisers" for giving wrong advice
and for starting "malicious" and/or "unrealistic" proceedings?
Dr David J Plews
email: [log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|