[log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 04/08/96 22:26:28, Hotch writes:
>
> >Ah, now I never said gp wasn't interesting, but I think
> >I would be willing to debate the motion: "For the most part,
> >general practice in 1996 is no fun!"
>
> I would be willing to oppose the motion. Any takers for seconding?
I'll second you Trefor! That is, if anyone counts what a gp
registrar thinks. I'm fed up with people putting general practice down,
I had enough of that from surgeons et al in medical school without having
to hear it endlessly from GPs. Let's talk up the profession for a
change.
> I think GP-UK would be an excellent forum for a formal debate. Shall we say a
> maximum of 350 words for each opening statement and 250 for the seconders,
> with a maximum of two weeks to finish the discussion and take a vote?
> All those in favour of a formal debate say aye
AYE.
Rachel
---------
Dr Rachel Hopkins
GP Registrar, East Oxford Health Centre
GP Registrar Observer at RCGP
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|