In message <[log in to unmask]>, Neil Hopkinson
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 17:39:38 -0400
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Cc: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: GMS - 4 Claim forms and FHSAs
>> Reply-to: [log in to unmask]
>
>> In a message dated 14/07/96 13:10:24, K walton Writes:
>>
>> >he protection against fraud lies
>> >in the audit trail on the computer not in whether the claim is on green
>> >or white paper.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> But the point I made was that the computer audit trail is minimal/non
>> existant and the paper is easily lost. We are going to have problems proving
>> we have made valid claims in the future unless, as our practice does, we keep
>> copies of the green forms before we send them.
>Sorry for my ignorance of the rules. Do we have to prove valid
>claims, or does the Health Authority have to prove invalid claims?
Isn't this the problem - nobody knows what the rules are.Apparently they
are still being discussed..
It's difficult to collect the evidence for inspection in 3 years' time
if you have no idea what will be demanded! :-)
Mary
--
Mary Hawking
Kingsbury Court Surgery
Church Street
Dunstable
Beds LU5 4RS
tel:01582 601289 (home)
01582 663218 (surgery)
fax:01582 476488 (surgery)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|