In message <[log in to unmask]>,
[log in to unmask] writes
>
>> I'm not too bothered about the former, as there is little I want to do
>> via NHSNet that can't be done via the secure gateways that are to be
>> provided.
>
>Does this mean that you could accomplish maintainance via NHSnet and are
>suppliers able to become non-NHS organisations on NHSnet. Where are you on
>discussions with IMG? It seems clearly crucial that you must have access!
It is likely that supplier will get access to NHS Net. But I don't think
this will provide an approriate solution for remoyte access. At least
not while GPs are on dial up links to NHS Net
>
>> A threat model that regonised that the threat was primarily from abuse
>> by insiders, would lead to a securiry architecture that might as well
>> assume that the network was insecure (like the internet) and removes the
>> need for over the top border controls. This put locks on internal doors,
>> desks and filing cabinets.
>
>How much do the locks cost, who provides them and I suppose who pays for them?
>Is not border control an additional protection?
I don't think so. Bars aren't not a lot of good when the tigers inside
the cage with you.
>
>Colin
>
>Colin J Browne The Black Country Family Practice
> Queens Rd, Tipton, West Midlands, England
>
>============== End part 2 ============================
Ewan Davis
[log in to unmask] - Bromsgrove, UK
Managing Director AAH Meditel Ltd - Supplier of EMR Systems.
[log in to unmask] Voice +44 (0)1527 579414 Fax +44 (0)1527
837287
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|