In message <[log in to unmask]>,
[log in to unmask] writes
>
>
>> I'm not too bothered about the former, as there is little I want to do
>> via NHSNet that can't be done via the secure gateways that are to be
>> provided.
>
>Does this mean that you could accomplish maintainance via NHSnet and are
>suppliers able to become non-NHS organisations on NHSnet. Where are you on
>discussions with IMG? It seems clearly crucial that you must have access!
>
>> A threat model that regonised that the threat was primarily from abuse
>> by insiders, would lead to a securiry architecture that might as well
>> assume that the network was insecure (like the internet) and removes the
>> need for over the top border controls. This put locks on internal doors,
>> desks and filing cabinets.
>
>How much do the locks cost, who provides them and I suppose who pays for them?
>Is not border control an additional protection?
>
>Colin
>
>Colin J Browne The Black Country Family Practice
> Queens Rd, Tipton, West Midlands, England
>
Colin I seem to have stumbled into part II of something and cannot tell
who you are 'talking to'. Was this copied in error or have I somehow
missed part I?
I assume it has to do with suppliers' access to the NWN to enable SW
maintenance?
John
>
--
John Williams, Senior User GP / Provider Links Project
Email: [log in to unmask]
Fax: 01483 440928
Mobile: 0374754302
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|