In your message dated Monday 1, July 1996 you wrote :
> Many of the contributors to GP-UK (non-GPs and GPs alike) work for
> companies that sell products to the primary care sector. This includes
> me. Many of the products with which we (such contributors) are
> involved would be of benefit to list members. They would, of course,
> also be of financial benefit to the contributors!
>
> I would like to see clarification from the list owners of the policy
> on posts that have a commercial element. I am aware of the academic
> nature of GP-UK but feel that an acceptable way of talking about
> products directly related to the content of posts would be desirable
> and potentially beneficial to all parties concerned.
>
> At the present time, advice and practice seems sometimes to conflict.
> See David Plews' previous posts on this matter and the seemingly
> accepted "in-sig" advertising.
> ===============================================================
> Mike Carey :- Doctors' Independent Network
> http://www.demon.co.uk/DIN
> "The Best Of Healthcare On The Internet!"
> ===============================================================
>
No thank you. Just download over 100 messages from gp-uk. I *do not* want every
rep and drug company filling my mailbox, thank you very much.
Declaration of interest - hypocrit.
=====================================================
Dr David J PLews
[log in to unmask] (but not for much longer?)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|