In a message dated 16/07/96 18:36:17, you write:
>'m no great fan of RFA (quite the opposite in fact) but you seem to be
>blamming it for things you shouldn't.
>
>
Ewan,
This is something that Microdoc have recently convinced me of . MOst of the
problems with the software seem to be that the suppliers, the users and
the DoH all want different things from GP computing. Some suppliers are more
successful than others, some users are more fed up than others, but no-one
seems to understand why the RFA says what it does. We have recently had
someone from Quarry House speaking to our user group about the RFA and he
felt that there were aspects of the rules that were not in anyones best
interest, they were "this sounds like the sort of thing that GP's ought to be
able to do" ideas.
Can anyone own up to being on the committee that produced RFA 3, and did they
agree with it. If not, why not?. The effect on the end product may cost the
NHS 10's of htousands of UKPounds (or us!!)
Lurkers please chase.
Trefor Roscoe Email; [log in to unmask]
Beighton Health Centre Tel 0114 - 269 5061
Queens Road, Beighon Fax 0114 - 269 7186
Sheffield S19 6BJ
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|