JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  1996

GP-UK 1996

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Some random thoughts

From:

P S Buttar <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sun, 15 Dec 1996 10:40:36 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (76 lines)

This posting is brought about by the random association of some
events this week - in particular, Peter Johnson's tale ('Quality??'),
the disgruntled comments of one of my partners, and Iain Hotchkiss'
column in the weekly rag, which seemed even more gloomy than ever
(commiserations if you'd had a bad week, Iain ;)).

To start with, I feel that there can be no justification for what
happened to Peter and his family, though we've only heard one side of
the story - having been on the receiving end of patient complaints
alleging horrendous callousness on my part, which have then proved to
be quite unsubstantiated, I feel I have to attach that caveat!
However - any I don't say this in an attempt to excuse what happened
- such incidents are vastly outnumbered by those in which patients
treat us in an unreasonable manner. There have been occasions when I
have spoken to patients in a regrettable manner, and (as far as I can
remember) I have always apologised afterwards - I don't recall any
apologies from patients after they have spoken to me in such a
manner. Peter's comment that public sympathy for GPs is wearing very
thin is probably true, and is worrying - any profession, be it
medicine, law or window-cleaning, which allows the relationship
between those who practise it and those who use it to deteriorate to
this level is in serious trouble.

One of my partners spent some time this week telling me about why he
was groing increasingly disillusioned with the profession, a feeling
that seems to be mirrored in some of the postings to GP-UK, and in
the correspondence columns of just about every medical publication.
It seems to me that we have allowed ourselves to be caught between
two mutually exclusive positions. One the one hand, we can provide
the 'traditional' type of general practice care, with sympathetic,
considerate GPs for whom nothing is too much trouble, who are always
there, and are at the heart of their communities; or we can provide a
consumer-oriented service, responding to the demands (which may be
rather different from the needs) of the patients (or clients, as I
expect we will be required to call them in future). It suits
politicians pf all complexions to have us in this position, as they
can get something approaching a consumer-oriented service for the
cost of the more traditional service, but it suits no-one else,
certainly not us.

There was a very thoughtful letter in the BMJ a couple of years back
from a retiring GP who commented that, when he joined the profession,
he was told that he could expect about one professional complaint in
his career, would earn more than his solicitor, and could practise
medicine in a climate in which violence against GPs was unheard of.
The letter-writer went on to ask how we had allowed our leadership to
let the current state of affairs arise, in a cmparatively short time.
I would suggest that he looked no further than some of the
pronouncements of the BMA in recent times; long after fundholding
became a fact of life for many of us, the BMA has continued to fight
a battle that was lost in 1990, rather than finding a battle that it
might win. For example, whatever its weaknesses, fundolding has
allowed us to put a price on providing a decent level of care for our
patients - we could all use the prices provided by our local trusts
to calculate how much we need to get everyone the operations,
appointments, etc, that they need, and could then present the
politicians and the public with the bill - after that, we would be in
a position to say to them that the level of service they get is the
level of service they are prepared to pay for. Instead, we have
allowed politicians to divide us into factions promoting or opposing
fundholding, community-based purchasing, etc etc etc.

Like many of my colleagues, I too have grown disillusioned with a
system that fails my patients and fails me. Should a decent
opportunity arise in another field, I will take it. I expect many
others will too (as Iain suggests in his precent posting about M&S),
and the politicians (and the public) will be left with an
impoverished service.

Apologies for the length of this.

Prit Buttar


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager