----------
> From: John Williams <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Microsoft Exchange
> Date: Wednesday 11 December 1996 12:21
>
> In article <[log in to unmask]>, Ahmad Risk
> <[log in to unmask]> writes
> >2. I am aware that if you want to send 'structured messages' you
> >need 'edifact'.
> >
> >3. My question is: *why* do you need to send structured messages in
> >the first place? To date, no one has come up with a convincing
> >answer.
>
> There are very convincing arguments for use of structured messages - it
> is just that apparently no one has succeeded in convincing you. :-)
I would say structured data, rather than messaging. No need to send it
anywhere (necessarily). Most of the time when I use the practice computer I
am in "view" mode, but there has to be an "extract and sort" capability
also. For that to occur across a web interface I think you need to consider
a standard markup.
________________________________________________________________
Dr Paul Galloway
MedWeb UK http://www.medweb.co.uk
The interactive medical website for UK doctors
________________________________________________________________
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|