Peter,
We meet in the strangest places.
Yes - still doing the MSN stuff, but with a feeling that the proprietory
services are a bit of a dead-end.
Unless I hear to the contrary I shall assume that this sig is ok then, and
I shall be safe from Hotch's rectal instrumentation <g>
David
__________________________________
David Rayne
UK Health Centre: http://www.healthcentre.org.uk
----------
> From: Peter Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
> To: GP-UK mailing list <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: RE: sigs
> Date: Thursday, December 05, 1996 12:15
>
> Hi David, we meet again :-)
>
> I think it's OK to sig
> "David"
> It's also OK to sig
> "David, GP"
> It's probably OK to sig (If you still are doing it!)
> "David Rayne, GP, Forum Manager, Microsoft Network"
> It's probably *not* OK to sig
> "David Rayne, GP, Forum Manager, Microsoft Network, Microsoft Corp,
Source of
> all manner of wonderful things that Microsoft sell, e.g. Operating
systems,
> software, Internet access and browsers, etc., etc.
>
> IMHO anyone remotely interested in your field will already know of your
> products and such a sig file must therefore be advertising to those who
do not
> and this is not an appropriate place to do so.
>
> Regards
>
> Peter
>
> P.S. Recalling one of earliest conversations; I, too, now have a pipeline
> burst cache *and* it's bigger than yours. Not sure whether I'm using it
at the
> moment though!
>
> Dr Peter Wilson, GP. Medical Manager, EKDOC
> The Mockett's Wood Surgery Kent International Airport
> Broadstairs, Kent, CT10 2TR Manston, Kent, CT12 5BP
> Tel. 01843 862179 Fax. 01843 590782
>
>
> ----------
> From: [log in to unmask] on behalf of David Rayne
> Sent: 03 December 1996 23:13
> To: GP-UK mailing list
> Subject: sigs
>
> There was some debate here a week or so ago about whether sigs are seen
as
> unaccepatble advertising or useful information about the poster.
>
> Was a concensus reached - and if so what was it?
>
> David
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|