In article <[log in to unmask]>,
[log in to unmask] writes
><< 60 million is never "mere". Where did the figure come from? If that
> was just GPs (30,000) that would be 2,000 UKP per GP! I would be
> surprised!!! >>
>
>I wouldn't, it only takes a few jokers like the GP who with a pharmacist
>defrauded several 100,000 by writing fraudulent scripts to bump up the
>average, perhaps the lurkers from the papers (who have been strangely silent
>for a month or so) would like to do an archive search on fraud for the last
>12 months and add up the figures, that would get a tip of the iceberg figure
Isn't it strange how stories like this appear each year just before the
review body gets to work.
Any bets against at least two more GP fraud stories emerging before year
end???
Cynical? Me?
--
Tim Walter
GP and Medical Manager Newdocs Ltd. West Berks.
Emis Web page : http://www.yingtong.demon.co.uk
Nikon page : http://www.yingtong.demon.co.uk/nikon/current.htm
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|