This would explain why I am finding the Win95 address book so difficult
to use. I found a telephone dialler while searching for more info on
the address book. The dialler could be a lot more useful if it had more
slots for storing telephone numbers, and even more useful if it linked
into the address book (perhaps it does and I haven't discovered the
connection).
In article <[log in to unmask]>, Ewan Davis
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>The problem is that win95 has two address books, their not compatable
>and while some applications can use both this is a real pain. To reduce
>there value further there badly implemented and one (I can't remember
>which) is still in a pure american form with cit,state and ZIP code
>fields. This was clearly an area (one of many) that MS decided not to
>sort to avoid win95 become win96.
>
>I like win95 but I'll be glad to see an upgrade.
>
> In article <[log in to unmask]>, Dr Alan Hassey
><[log in to unmask]> writes
>>Paul J Scott wrote:
>>
>>> This sounds to good to be true! I was interested to read that Win 95
>>> has an address book. I have searched help but cannot find a mention of
>>> it. Where is it?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Paul J Scott, Primary Care Physician, United Kingdom.
>>> Fax 44 (0)1935 410188
>>
>>No - it's all true. Win 95's address book is MS Schedule or you can use the
>>address
>>facilities in MS Exchange.
>
>Ewan Davis
>[log in to unmask] - Bromsgrove, UK
>
>Managing Director AAH Meditel Ltd - Supplier of EMR Systems.
>[log in to unmask] Voice +44 (0)1527 579414 Fax +44 (0)1527
>837287
--
Paul J Scott, Primary Care Physician, United Kingdom.
Fax 44 (0)1935 410188
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|