JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  1996

GP-UK 1996

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Surgery PCs and the Net

From:

Ross Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 25 Oct 1996 09:49:53 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (47 lines)

> pundits on both the "it will collapse under demand" and the
> "bandwidth will keep being added" sides.

I went to a workshop yesterday on high performance protocols, where
one of the topics was what benefit you could get from a really fast
network link. Using 25Mbit/sec ATM (asynchronous transfer mode) an
X.400 system managed only 10,000 messages of 7Kb per hour while a
system using internet protocols managed over 60,000.

However it would be an oversimplification to just say, `well X400 is
a phone company protocol. Don't you expect it to chew bandwidth?'
There are bottlenecks sending all the control signals back and forth
between the user and message transfer agents. Simply adding bandwidth
won't necessarily help you much.

> I think the more interesting point you make, though, is on the signing
> of clinical messages:  Whilst I fully understand the need for this in
> the mesaging/EDI paradigm, it is much less clear to me whether such
> signatures are a necessity/relevant in the Web/interactive paradigm

A few days ago, I had to send a fax to a crypto company in America. I
hit their web page, cut and pasted the mail and fax addresses into
the letter, and shipped it. Eventually I got email asking where the
fax was. It turned out that the contact data I had fetched from what
appeared to be their site had been completely wrong. They are now
looking at whether it was an attack on them.

Fortunately the letter's contents were not at all sensitive.

> the path results are not physically copied via EDI from hospital
> system to GP system but are accessed interactively each time they are
> needed

This is not entirely clear. US hospitals, who keep everything, are
now accumulating digital image data at a rate of about 1TB per
hospital per year. That costs money to store. In the NHS, as you
know, films get recycled and disk space gets reused.

So it may well be prudent for a physician who is making a critical
diagnosis on the basis of a medical image to cache a copy of it with
the patient's record, for both clinical and medico-legal reasons.

Ross


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager