> Firstly 'their' site is actually the NHS's (assuming you're talking
> about NHWweb rather than BT's own HealthWeb - a crucial and
> confusing point).
I am talking about BT's own HealthWeb. You know, the one that was
advertised to this list not that long ago?
According to BT, although their own public domain internet site
(HealthWeb) is on the open i-way, the server itself is that of the
NHSnet.
So, although they invite you to take part in the pilot for NHSWeb on
an open site, yet, you still have to connect to the NHSnet.
That smacks of a stich up (allegedly).
Give me a break, will you?
> BT is just the contracted ISP for NHSweb. A connection deal with
> Mercury would get access too.
I am aware of that Alan.
> Secondly, I'm guessing here, but this is only a pilot of NHSweb. Perhaps they
> want to ensure fast and clean access, hence ISDN2 for the piloters.
> Motive: good results.
hehehe. So the system is not up to the rigour of testing by humble
earthlings or what? Good results can be had (or otherwise) by
testing under the worst conditions my dear Watson.
Are we then only interested in "manipulated" good results?
Ought not everybody, including IMG be interested in all results,
good or bad so that we can make an informed judgement?
Is this another stich up? (allegedly).
> PS Perhaps 'Al-Hakim' should be suffixed with 'to pieces' !!
Ah, but "the pieces" add up to more than the whole!
> (in defence of colleagues mode)
Didn't know you worked for BT Alan!
Al-Hakim (to pieces the whole shall go, one day!)
______________________________
Dr Ahmad Risk MBBCh
home: 01273-688121
work: 01737-240022
Fax: 01737-244660
web: http://www.cybermedic.org/
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|