[log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> >Following this post, I phoned the MCA to confirm that they were intending to
> >act
> >against this company but was told that as of that time (11am, Sept. 5th
> 1996)
> >
> >the matter was still under investigation and that no decision has been taken
> >yet
> >about any proceedings.
> >
>
> Will Graham Ross now go quietly or will the plug have to be pulled????
Meaning what? An explanation would help.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|