Mike Wells wrote:
> I would not rely on a private (ie restricted access) network to do
> much about security. Any large network is very liable to be
> get-at-able by outsiders, and in any case most of the real risks are
> from insiders.
>
This really sums it up - there really is no point in a "secure" (he he)
network where there are 900,000 "insiders"!!!
--
******************************************************************
*Alan Hassey email [log in to unmask] & [log in to unmask]*
* http://www.midwife.demon.co.uk/ >>>>>> PGP public key available*
* GP, GP Trainer & GP Computer Adviser (NYHA), Skipton, N. Yorks.*
******************************************************************
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|