Hi Roger,
personally I would prefer the normalization to TIV; but this might depend on your hypothesis...
Best,
Christian
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 19:53:12 +0000, Roger Newman-Norlund <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hi all,
>Regarding the results that are generated by cat12 when using the SUIT atlas segmentation (for a between group comparison of both total cerebellar volume and volume of cerebellar ROIs):
>Should these values be normalized by eTIV?
>If not, should they be normalized by 'cerebellarTV' (if yes to this, how can I get total cerebellar volume)?
>Thank you,
>Roger
|