Dear colleague in the eye-tracking community,
on behalf of the authors, I would like to announce our recent BRM publication “Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline” (https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8 <https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8>)
In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section “An empirically based minimal reporting guideline”).
If you are attending ECEM in August (https://www.ecem2022.com), I hope for an interesting discussion there, on these topics.
best regards,
/ Kenneth
--
EYE-MOVEMENT mailing list ([log in to unmask])
N.B. Replies are sent to the list, not the sender
To unsubscribe, etc. see http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/eye-movement/introduction.html
Other queries to list owner at [log in to unmask]
|