Dear Mugundhu,
the example is somewhat borderline and the motion artifacts are rather small. If you are unsure you can try to include/exclude that subject and see whether your hypothesis is better fitted.
Best,
Christian
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 11:38:58 +0530, Mugundhu R <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Dear Expert,
>
>Please find the attached images with the visual motion artifact (attached
>raw image and wm images of the same subject). I did preprocess using CAT12
>and I found the resolution= 85% (B), noise=71.44% (C-), bias=96.68% (A+),
>and the IOQ is 74.16% (C). Though these values show that the quality of
>the image is satisfactory, I have a dilemma to process further because of
>the visual artifact. My humble request to you to have a look at the
>attached file and give your valuable suggestions.
>
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Mugudhu
>
|