In that case, the link looks like this
Users -- ISP -- IXP -- CDN
So the IXP traffic grows in proportion with the CDN traffic, as indicated in the report. But I thought CDN providers could talk with ISPs in order to put nodes directly inside ISP networks. Isn't it the case today?
Regards
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Semantic Address Routing and Hardware - SARAH [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: Tuesday, 23 November 2021 13:06
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SARAH] the end of the Internet according to Geoff
Hesham ElBakoury <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> This European IXP report shows that IXP traffic is growing:
> ixp_report_2018-2019-final.pdf (euro-ix.net)
> <https://www.euro-ix.net/media/filer_public/d5/84/d584495f-b8ae-4f24-b589-7b9efed3594b/ixp_report_2018-2019-final.pdf>
The question isn't whether IX traffic is growing.
The question is whether non-CDN traffic at IXs is growing.
Well, the question is whether non-CDN traffic is growing in general, and we think that looking at IX traffic stats is a good way to measure that since it is hard to see into the many private peering and transit connections.
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the SARAH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=SARAH&A=1
This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/SARAH, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the SARAH list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=SARAH&A=1
This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/SARAH, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
|
